Effects of Parental Status on Children

Effects of agnatic Status on Children3.2 PARENTAL HABITS, OCCUPATION, SOCIAL CLASS AND PARENTAL pedagogyHow peers feel ab away their paternitys occupation influences babyrens attitudes. From contacts with their friends p arnts or what they see on video recording or read in books, children build up concepts of an ideal make and father.Children feel that if they have better homes, better play equipment than their peers, they feel superior. If on the separate hand their socio-economic status is inferior, it is likely to lead to feelings of inferiority. Children like to emulate their pargonnts and thus, bad habits in parents may naturally pass on to them.Ganga et al in their study observed that in 66.2% of children there was history of inebriant abuse by fathers, with almost of their income wasted on liquor and gambling. totally the boys studied were from an urban or semi-urban area belonging to poor socio-economic cate unskillful. In 40. 9% boys both parents were illiterate, in 33 8% only father was a functional literate. 52% of the parents were daily w hop on earners with irregular practice session and 14. 2% were in quasi or full time brass job.24Thilagaraj noted that in 51 % of the children had been brought up in slums and 68% of them had parents exclusively illiterate. Alcohol usage was found in 78% of the parents.263.3 EMERGING CAUSES- innate(p) calamities, AIDS, etcIn the later part of the 20th century the World has witnessed about of the worst natural disasters. India too has witnessed the natural calamities on an unprecedented scale. The gory memories of the earthquake hitting Maharashtra in 1993, followed by another equally awful quake rocking the state of Gujarat in 2000 taking a heavy cost of human knows is still vivid. The problems of flooding in the east and north eastern parts of India is a recurrent cardinal to live with, resulting in breathing out of many human lives. More recently the killer Tsunami waves hitting the gray co ast of India taking the official death toll to over 10000.37 During such(prenominal) calamities children are always the first to get relief aid, hence it would be a legitimate conclusion that compared to the build of adult lives lost, the number of child deaths would be low.Mohan Y from JIPMER Pondicherry, in their preliminary study on the Tsunami touched victims in Pondicherry found out that 2% of children below 15 eld were divested with most of them being losing their fathers.38 Lakhotia N and co-workers in a comply in the relief camps provided for the victims for the 2000 Gujarat earthquake, noted that in nearly 3% of children whizz of the parents was cogitationed missing, and in 1 % it was confirmed that one and only(a) of them was dead.39 Sarkar N R et at in their study noted that 4% of strips had lost one of their parents in the floods over three twelvemonths.40 Lindblade K A and co-workers feel that one of the consequences of HIV/AIDS epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa i s an increase in the number of orphans, estimated to have reached 6-11 % of children below 15 stratums by year 2000.414. PROBLEMS OF ORPHANS DUE TO ORPHANINGOrphan-hood is frequently accompanied with multidimensional problems including prejudice, reduced access to wellness and school services, inadequate food, sexual abuse and others.42Joyce K. Kikafunda et al found that orphan children living with their elderly grandparents are highly malnourished . A representative sample size of one hundred (100) elderly headed homes was calculated. Fifty (50) homes of children with both parents were randomly selected to act as a comparison group. A case-by-case child under the age of ten was randomly picked for anthropometrical measurements in each selected home. The results of this study show that a large proportion of the orphans (47 %) are malnourished when compared with only 28 % of malnourished non-orphans found in the everyday homes. In addition, our study findings revealed that the o lder the orphans (0 10 years) living with the elderly get, the higher(prenominal) the level of underweight.43The death of one or both parents has a difficult and spiritednesslong impact on the psychological wellbeing of children. Adolescents in crabbed are at increased risk for unresolved or manifold bereavement because of their outgrowthal vulnerability and emotional dependency.44Hierarchical framework for examine the causal pathways surrounded by OVC experience and ill-health and malnutrition. N/B The UNICEF indicators used in the analysis are shown in the brackets- where there is no appropriate indicator to fit into the framework, NA (not available) is noted under the risk factor.455. ORPHANAGE5.1 expositionOrphanage is the name to describe a residential institution employ to the consider and education of orphans i.e., children whose parents are deceased or otherwise unable to bring off for them. 46Institutions differ from families in both the organization of their stage setting and in the roles of their participants. These factors affect the behaviors of the participants, both children and cater, and the process of the childrens development.5.2 DIFFERENCE amidst THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INSTITUTIONAND FAMILIESMajor characteristics of a total institution as proposed by Goffman are as followsA total institution establishes barriers to complaisant coition with the outside world.It is difficult to leave a total institution.All aspects of life in a total institution are conducted in the alike(p) place under thesame single authority.Everybody is obliged to act and to live together with his/her inmates.Officials in a total institution schedule and tell all phases of inmates activity.There is a basic split between a large man aged(a) group (inmates) and a smallsupervisory mental faculty.Inmates have dependant contacts with the outside world, whereas staff members aresocially integrated with the outside world.47In contrast, the family is an ope n setting where each family member participates in some other settings (e.g. school, day pull off, playground, work place, peer group, church, etc.). As a system, the family consists of a number of dyads and multiads (e.g. marital couple, children, older members of the family, etc.).Participation in these dyads and multiads determines the roles of family members ( economise and father, son, brother, and grandson, etc.). Each of these roles is activated by a certain context which contributes to the development of the child. Thus, in families children witness multiple roles of family members (father and husband mother and wife sister and daughter etc.). In contrast, an institutional staff functions in fixed social roles with strictly denied social behaviors. 48 other important difference between the family and the institution is that the former is a self- countenanceing system, but the latter is not. The family may or may not swear on the outside world for help, but the majorities o f life-supporting activities originates within the family and are carried out by family members, both adults and children. Mothers and fathers combine roles of providers, cooks, servants, educators, and caretakers in the uncouth process and mutual context of life, and are assisted by their children. In an institution, these life-supporting activities are distributed between many staff with little or no participation by institutionalized children. 486. QUALITY OF SERVICES RENDERED IN ORPHANAGEChabra et al in their study on the nutritional status and morbidity among 192 boys aged 6-12 years in a children observation in North western hemisphere Delhi, noted that the infrastructure in terms of dining rooms, toilets, recreational facilities and aesculapian care was inadequate.49Erick Otieno Nyambedha et al in his study found that 84% of caregivers verbalise orphans has schooling problems,48% of them said orphans has food problems,20% said hospital facilities are lacking.50Horwitz S M and co-workers observed in their study on children in a foster care facility in New Haven computed tomography State USA, that there were no adequate toilet facilities for the inmates and the caretakers to child proportion was also inadequate.51Suma Narayan Reddy observed in her study that out of 16 orphans asylums surveyed by her, there were 28 caretakers, only 2 caretakers had formal training and orientation courses in mental health problems of children and their early recognition and institution of healing(p) measures.52Kapur M et al observed that most of the caretakers involved in the care of juvenile delinquents were not properly trained in recognizing the emotional problems amongst children.53Takayama and co-workers report in their study on a child protection meaning in San Francisco that the number of Caretakers was inadequate, and the medical services too were inadequate.547. PROBLEMS FACED BY THE ORPHANS IN ORPHANAGESChildren living in institution invariably face a wide variety of problems inherent in institutional care such as(1) shortage of trained staff and the associated problem of high staff turnover(2) children living in groups set up their own social system and code of behavior which may oppose rather than support the aims of the institution(3) contradictions between the needs for regulation and the need to individualize the difference of opinion between the needs of the individual child and the needs of the group. Thus the children are caught amidst such inevitable situation and demands in the institutions. 55Five areas of probable biologic and social risk to infants and young children inorphans asylum care includeinfectious morbiditynutrition and growthcognitive developmentsocio affective development physiologic abuses 55Orphanage children are deprive of their primary care givers, so they are more prone to physical health problems. Various studies have been conducted at national and international level, on health problems of orphans and vulnerable children in orphanage.Some of them are as follows.Chabra et al conducted a study on health and nutritional status of 192 boys in the age group of 6 to 12 years in a children observation home in Delhi. close 148 (60%) boys had some or the other forms of morbidity. Skin disease was the commonest morbidity (31.7%), followed by disease of the oral pit (16%), acute respiratory infection (8.6%) and disease of the ear (9.9%). Additionally, the study revealed that that (36.7%) of boys were malnourished, and (13.5%) of the boys exhibited signs of circumstantial nutritional deficiencies.49Bhuvanesh Shukla et al found that most commonest health problems in orphanage are clamber disease. A sample size of 104 children between the age group of 5 14 years was studied. Orphanage children skin problems shows that 3.84% of them had skin patches. Most of the (83%) children had dandruff, 25% of them had pediculosis.50% of them had dental carries, 33.5 of them had gingivitis, 57.7% of t hem were malnourished.10Karim SA et al conducted a study in an orphanage in Dhaka to find out the outbreak of urge and socio-economic profile, water sanitation facilities, personal hygiene and living condition of the orphan children. The study included 492 children and they received clinical check up. The result highlights that 98%children had scabies, and 71% has been infected.56Dhanya Muralidharan et al a study conducted on oral health status of children in orphanage found that dental tooth decay is most common in them. There were a total of 221 children in the orphanage with a boy to girl ratio of 1.61. The number of children having dental caries at baseline was 129 (58.37%). They concluded that comprehensive dental health care program (CDHP) is effective in overall improvement of general and oral health. In resource limited countries like India, such programs organized by dental schools can improve oral health.57Takayama J I et al observed in their study population that among the 0 to 6 year olds, 27% children had upper respiratory illnesses, 23% had developmental delay and 21% had skin conditions. Among the 7 to 12 age group, 32% failed vision screen, 12% had dental caries and 11% had upper respiratory illness. Among the 13-18 year olds, 31% had failed vision screening, 12% had positive tuberculin skin tests.54Miller L C and Hendrie N W noted that of the 452 Chinese children adopted form divers(a) orphanages from China and observed at an Adoption clinic between 1991-1998, Growth and developmental delays were frequent, in 39% for height, 18% for weight, 24% for head circumference. 75% had monumental developmental delay in at least 1 knowledge domain Gross motor in 55%, Fine motor in 49%, Cognitive in 32%, Language in 43%, Social-emotional in 28%, Activities of Daily Living 30% and global delays in 44%, 35% were anaemic, 10% had abnormal thyroid function tests, 9% had intestinal parasitosis (usually Giardia). 3.5% had positive skin tests for tuberculos is, 6% had positive hepatitis B go forth antigen, 22% had positive hepatitis B surface antibody. Unsuspected significant medical diagnoses including hearing loss, orthopedic problems and congenital anomalies were seen in 12% of children.58Wilai S et al conducted a study in Pathum Thani Province, Thailand to evaluate the intestinal parasitic infections in orphanage children. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 106 preschool orphans (60 males and 46 females) and their stool samples were collected. Almost 86 individuals (81.1%) were infected with at least one parasite.59Ganga et al in their study on 225 children in Thanjavur Observation home observed that, infectious diseases, diseases of the eyes, ear, skin and dental caries